Fresh developments have emerged in the ongoing controversy surrounding the alleged fake Federal Government agency, with new claims challenging earlier reports that sought to link the President's Chief of Staff, Chief Femi Gbajabiamila, to the matter.



The latest development follows a widely circulated interview reportedly granted by Prince Matthew Adeyemi, the individual alleged to have presented himself as the Director-General of the controversial agency. During the interview, he reportedly denied ever meeting Chief Gbajabiamila or having any form of direct or indirect communication with him.


According to the interview, Prince Adeyemi also claimed that he possesses no documentary evidence, audio recordings, telephone conversations, emails, official correspondence, or other materials linking the President's Chief of Staff to the alleged activities of the organisation.


The statements have sparked renewed debate across social media, where conflicting narratives have continued to circulate since the controversy first gained public attention. While some online reports previously alleged that evidence existed against the Chief of Staff, supporters of Gbajabiamila argue that the latest claims contradict those allegations and cast doubt on their credibility.


Attention has also focused on a purported engagement letter that circulated online and was claimed by some social media users to have originated from the Office of the Chief of Staff. Those defending Chief Gbajabiamila have described the document as unauthenticated and have maintained that it should not be regarded as proof of any official relationship.


The latest claims have attracted reactions from several public commentators, including media personality Daddy Freeze and content creator MC Ezzy, who have argued that the information emerging from the interview supports the position that the President's Chief of Staff should not be linked to the alleged fake agency without verifiable evidence.


Legal analysts have continued to stress the importance of due process, noting that allegations involving public officials should be thoroughly investigated by the appropriate authorities before conclusions are reached. They also caution against relying solely on unverified social media reports in matters of significant public interest.


As public discussion continues, observers say the controversy underscores the need for accurate reporting, responsible public commentary, and evidence-based investigations. They maintain that all parties involved deserve fairness and that any findings should be based on independently verifiable facts rather than speculation or online narratives.


As of the time of filing this report, there has been no official court judgment or public investigative finding establishing that Chief Femi Gbajabiamila was involved in the alleged fake agency operation. Relevant authorities have yet to issue any definitive conclusion on the matter, and public attention remains focused on further developments.